The Classical Miasmatic Constitutional Homeopathy

Are there many Schools in Homeopathy? Why? Which is the correct one? How can, one, judge, objectively and with validity, any Homeopathic School? How can he, also, judge, objectively and with validity, any Therapeutic System? Suppression of symptoms or Etiological Treatment? Treatment of the local disease or treatment of the individual as a whole? Treatment only of the Acute Illnesses or treatment of the Chronic Predispositions of the individual? Treatment or Prevention? What about all those contemporary Schools of Homeopathy? Is, Clinical Homeopathy (disease oriented), true Homeopathy? Is Complex Homeopathy, true Homeopathy? What about Repertorising, Key-Note Prescribing and Computer Expert Systems? Why the author considers the previous three Mechanical Diagnostic Methods, as less effective? Why, they can’t affect the Chronic Predispositions of the individual? What innovations characterize the Classical Miasmatic Constitutional Homeopathy, developed by the author? Why, don’t, most Proving Pictures, correspond to naturally existing Clinical Pictures/Homeopathic Remedies? What’s Miasmatic Diagnosis? What’s Constitutional Diagnosis? What’s the difference between Primary and Secondary Behavior? What’s Non-Verbal Information? What are the Pathology Phases? The author supports that the Classical Miasmatic Constitutional Homeopathy is the most interesting, deep and effective method of diagnosis and treatment, because it’s founded on the Holistic Thinking and on the Universal and Homeopathic Laws.